|
Why Indian Cricket Players resist to sign WADA?
What is WADA? The World Anti-Doping Agency
(WADA) is the international independent organization created in 1999 to
promote, coordinate, and monitor the fight against doping in sport in all
its forms. Composed and funded equally by the sports movement and
governments of the world, WADA coordinated the development and
implementation of the World Anti-Doping Code, the document harmonizing
anti-doping policies in all sports and all countries. WADA works
towards a vision of the world that values and fosters a doping-free
culture in sport.
Why is it important
to combat doping in sport? Doping is one of the most important and difficult
problems confronting sports today. Doping threatens athlete health. In
most cases, the substances/methods abused in doping have not been tested
or approved for use by healthy individuals. Often, the substances/methods
used for doping have not yet been determined safe enough for therapeutic
use. Even more alarming is the abuse of counterfeit or designer drugs-
drugs that are not regulated for safety. All of these factors lead to
serious health risks to athletes who engage in doping. Doping also
threatens the integrity of sport. Doping, the use of artificial
enhancements to gain an advantage over others in competition, is cheating
and is fundamentally contrary to the spirit of sport. Further, doping robs
athletes who play by the rules of their right to competition that is safe
and fair. Doping affects not just top athletes, but youths influenced
by what the stars do. It is a growing problem of public health proportion
that cannot be ignored by any country or any sport. Only by taking a
concerted and comprehensive approach to fight against doping in sport is
it possible to protect the integrity of sport and the health of athletes
and youth worldwide.
Why is worldwide coordination
of the fight against doping in sport necessary?
A uniform approach to ridding sport of
doping, coordinated on a global scale through a partnership between Sport
and Government, is the only effective strategy to help stem the scourge of
doping, protect the health of athletes, and preserve the spirit of sport.
This was the consensus of Sport and Government in 1999, in response to the
1998 Tour de France scandal that rocked the world of sports. It was then
that WADA was established as the international body to harmonize and
marshal the global fight against doping in sport. Prior to the creation
of WADA and the globally harmonized fight against doping in sport, it was
extremely difficult to know just what substances and procedures were being
used and to what degree. The financial resources necessary to conduct
research and testing were extremely scarce and inadequate. In some cases,
the desire for continued "progress" in a sport went unchecked. Similarly,
the "underground" and clandestine use of drugs and methods proliferated
without threat of serious penalty. Certain organizations actually
participated in doping, if not tacitly approving of it. The perception
that a positive result constituted a "failure" or an embarrassment to the
sport persisted and may have even influenced decisions. Even more
frightening was that some governments instituted doping programs so that
their own athletes became mere pawns in campaigns for national sports
glory. Prior to the creation of WADA, it was primarily the sports
organizations which led the fight against doping within their own
respective realms of influence. The perception then was that-with the
propagation of conflicting definitions, policies and sanctions-too many
mixed messages were being sent. The somewhat isolated and disjointed
efforts to combat doping, no matter how well-intentioned, did little to
stem the scourge of doping.
Now coming to the main topic,
"Why Indian Cricket Players resist to sign WADA?
There is a clause in WADA, which
demands the players to inform about their whereabouts when they are not
playing cricket and their availability for an hour. This is required to
perform a random doping test as per the WADA act. But Indian players are
not willing to sign this rule. The two reasons our cricketers give for
not signing-up with WADA - Intrusion of privacy and security Intrusion
of privacy When me or you sneak into a cricketers property or hack in
to his bank account that might be considered intrusion of privacy. Imagine
an enforcement agency like the Income Tax department wanting to do the
same. Is it intrusion of privacy ? I think not, there is a
difference between an enforcement agency and a stalker. WADA is a world
body that culls dope out of sports. So they are like any enforcement
agency you could think of, hence what they do is nothing but enforcement
of a code of conduct and not invading a cricketers privacy when he's
having a good time. I fear for my life, what will happen to my security
? WADA is a body recognized by the International
Olympic Committee (IOC) and many governments all around the world. So I
can't imagine them trying to sell their database to someone sitting in the
Tora Bora mountains nor would they have a hotline with them. There are
some stringent confidentiality clause / agreement that governs the WADA
officials conduct.
Let's quickly see why WADA came into existance the first
place ?
Seoul
Olympics 1988, 100m sprint One classic shot any sports buff would remember
vividly is that of Ben Johnson, the Canadian sprinter crossing the line
with one arm up in the air and looking to his left to see where his
nemesis Carl Lewis is placed. He broke the world record, for the second
time in a matter of months.
His celebrations were
shortlived, 3 days to be precise when newspapers announced that he has
been caught doping. The world became familiar with anabolic steroids,
performance enhancing drugs & in this case something called
Stanozolol. That was when the sporting world woke up to this menace of
doping. WADA was formed a year later, in 1999 with some initial funding
from the IOC. These days IOC along with many govenments world over fund
the WADA. The first WADA anti-doping code was implemented in 2004, just
before the Athens Olympics. Interestingly, there is a known name in the
WADA Athlete committee, Mr Anil Kumble from India. So why don’t our
demigods speak to him and know more about WADA and the whereabouts
clause. See what Abinav Bindra has to say about the whereabouts clause.
So it is not as tough or as intrusive as our cricketers make it to be. It
just requires some sportsmanship, like how Bindra explains the
process. "I hate pissing into a bottle".In the 90s when anti-doping
regulations were introduced into sports, this is what John McEnroe
remarked. May be, he didn't have to, but his successors do. Roger
Federer & Rafael Nadal might have reservations about the whereabouts
clause but they still are signatories to the WADA regulation and get
tested randomly.
Most of the top sportsmen and women are, aren't our
cricketers sportsmen ?
|